Why we ‘care’ more about bombings in Boston than Afghanistan


In the wake of the Boston bombings, many people have commented, often angrily, that these sorts of things happen constantly in many parts of the world yet receive no media coverage. The implication is that we are biased in some way. But maybe it’s something else.



America is often considered the world’s most advanced nation. They have a very well established and robust liberal democratic institutional framework. Their popular culture is imperialist and still inspires hundreds of thousands of migrants and would-be migrants every year. They are the richest nation on earth. They are the most powerful nation on earth. They are arguably the most successful nation on earth.

America is often considered a role model for other countries. Many people think that America represents a level of development and a way of life that is worth imitating. This is true of many Australians despite our more entrenched links with Britain.

So when something like the bombing of a large community event occurs in the United States we take notice. This place is supposedly the Promised Land, and yet it appears to have problems. We want to know what happened, why, and who was responsible. We wonder if it was a terrorist attack or if it was home grown, because that has implications for our vision of America as bastion of global liberty or unequal breeding ground of discontent.

We also pay attention because even in America, where levels of violence are unusually high for a developed country, such events are rare. Bomb blasts in Afghanistan are not rare. Therefore they are not news. Certainly there could be more coverage of the overall situation in such places, or analysis of trends in bomb blasts, but simply reporting every explosion as it occurs would be boring and tedious.

This does not reflect a lack of concern for places like Afghanistan; perhaps quite the opposite. America went into Afghanistan with a plan to make it more like America. If things are going really bad in America then that policy seems hypocritical. If we generally support America and its liberty imperialism to any extent then we are perfectly normal for being more fascinated by explosions in America than in Afghanistan or other hotbeds of unrest.

Some of the news coverage has been exceedingly banal. For example, a blow by commentary of what ASIO did when they got word of the Boston blast. But by and large there is nothing wrong with being more interested in American explosions than other ones. 

Comments